Kodak 6031330 Professional Ektar 100/36 Colour Negative Film

Product Information

Ektar lives in a world between two films: Professional negative film like Portra and slide film like Ektachrome. As you can see, knowing the times of day and how to properly filter can make a big difference in the sky. The park was originally meant for rock climbing, and loose carabiners can be found along multiple trails.

They are not exactly the same, sometimes even different, as I didn’t take the exact route for my photography expedition each morning. Ive also recently (thanks to Negative Feedbacks "cheap film comparison" - check youtube) tried some Kodak ColorPlus 200 (at 100 again) and that stuff is lovely, but a bit more expensive than Agfa Vista. I expect some Ektar I shot in gloomy Scotland in my mailbox any day now, that will give me some idea of Ektar on a cloudy day. My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f/0. Higher magnifications may provide more detail, but they can also make the image shakier due to hand movements.Kodak Ektar 100 has one of the best dynamic ranges and consistently produces incredibly striking scenes. You’ll save time, get consistent results, and you’ll get to figure out if you want to continue with film photography before investing in film development equipment. While certain printing processes and scanning software may be able to diminish this effect, it could get tricky to get rid of when it does show. The film was initially only offered in 35mm, but later the film offering was expanded to include 120 size film, then 4x5 and 8x10 sheet sizes in 2010.

However, with Kodak Ektar 100, the grain is barely noticeable throughout the entire image even in the out of focus areas and shadows where grain usually shows up the most. But, I also use Portra 400 in an auto-exposure camera without changing code on the can, and those photos usually look good too. As I wasn’t sure yet on the outcome of Ektar, I took a some Portra 400 with me as well, and concluded that it was a good opportunity to compare them both.In any case, it's really good that you made the comparison and after all having so many films to try is part of the fun !

First, it was a line of “ semi-pro ” C-41 emulsions sold in a variety of speeds — from ISO 25 to 1,000. This ran until 1996 when it was rebranded to Kodak Royal Gold, which was then discontinued just two years later. I can see portra as a natural skin tone film whereas Ektar works well as an alternative to higher saturation slide films; I’m expecting higher dynamic range. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at no additional charge to you.Kodak first used it on their professional-grade lenses from the 1930s to the 1960s, before launching an Ektar film in 1989 that was available in various ISO ratings.