It’s suggested frequently that the couple were used by those intent on getting self-promotion, and/or record commissions, off their Royal status. Speaking on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" on July 18 ahead of the book's release, Bower told the TV personality — who is known for being critical of the Sussexes — he believes the book could damage the Sussex brand. I now feel like reading about her and the royal family is like riding on top of a dumpster fire that drives right past a train flying off the track and I don’t know where to look. As for the Boris book, Bower was criticised for being highly biased ( his wife worked with Boris at the time), but having read the Meghan book, I am wondering if the criticism itself might be biased.

There are several other members of the royal family who have attended therapy for one reason or another, so there is no shame in it.And although he did mention the fact that there were reportedly 17 inconsistencies in the Oprah interview that proved wrong, he didn’t mention what these were. It was important to correspond with the stepping stones she wanted to use to rise above her own mediocrity (or social nothingness). Strong women who set a perfect example of how to rise from obscurity to respectable prosperity, come what may. The only interesting thing about Meghan is her SHEER AUDACITY in thinking she could come in and change a 1000 year old institution, and her ability to completely sever people from her life once she has gotten every scrap of use out of them. Whether it’s settling an old feud or avenging a loved one’s death, we simply cannot look away as the main character attempts to complete their ruthless mission.

He also said he makes "no apology" for citing the many different public sources and journalists who have written about the duchess in the past.Bower spells out far more than any other commentator that, having chosen activism and altruism as her 'brand', Markle (and latterly Harry), actively sought out, via paid PR agents, opportunities to publicise herself as much as the cause (particularly before she was well known); that she seldom really donated her time, but parleyed for expenses, such as first class flights for herself and friends in circumstances where charities like World Vision, for eg, are supposedly doing their all for starving Africans.