Synology Disk Station DS3622XS+ - NAS server - 12 bays - SATA 6Gb/s - RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, JBOD, RAID F1 - RAM 16 GB - Gigabit Ethernet / 10 Gigabit Ethernet - iSCSI support
FREE Shipping
Synology Disk Station DS3622XS+ - NAS server - 12 bays - SATA 6Gb/s - RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, JBOD, RAID F1 - RAM 16 GB - Gigabit Ethernet / 10 Gigabit Ethernet - iSCSI support
- Brand: Unbranded
Description
redpill / bios_hwcap_shim . c:65 > proxying GetHwCapability(id=2)->support => real=1 [org_fout=0, ovs_fout=0] redpill / bios_shim . c:215 > Symbol #29 in mfgBIOS "broadwellnk_synobios" {synobios_disk_power_short_break_report}
redpill / bios_shim . c:215 > Symbol #104 in mfgBIOS "broadwellnk_synobios" {GetBuzzerCleared}
Synology’s decision to only allow the use of their own branded storage media on enterprise-level solutions was met with a mixed reception when it was rolled out in early 2020. On the one hand, the HAT5300 series of drives ARE good drives, arriving at a price point similar to the likes of Seagate Ironwolf Pro and WD Red Pro Pro-class Drives BUT featuring the architecture, performance and durability of Enterprise-class drives (such as Seagate EXOs and WD Gold) – it is a pretty good deal. Likewise, those looking for a full ‘one party’ solution will be pleased as it allows simple installation, deployment and management (with firmware updates and drive warranties being considerably easier to manage). However, with only three capacities of HAT5300 (8, 12 and 16TB) at the moment, as well as a relatively sudden pull on the support of other hard drive brands on this system, it has left quite a few users unhappy. Likewise, the decision in DSM 7 for the storage manager to prevent the use of non-compatible (i.e non-Synology) hard drives to be used in a storage pool completely, seems a touch aggressive in its presentation. As I have mentioned previously, I do actually quite like the HAT5300 series of hard drives, but the push by the brand to over-simplify the compatibility and support of 3rd party drives is something that I am less keen on and definitely do not want to see being extended to the rest of the PLUS/SMB line up lower down the portfolio in 2022.Now, this leads me to my first minor gripe – those ethernet cables. On the face of it, providing additional LAN cables is always good (the system has a possible 5 network connections by default), but the cables are Cat 5e, not Cat 6 – which is what I would expect from a 10GbE equipped solution like the DS3622xs+. This is an incredibly pedantic point I know, but it’s a small thing to have been overlooked and anyone that takes their 10GbE setup seriously will want to swap these out immediately. The main difference between CAT5e and CAT6 cable lies within the bandwidth, the cable can support for data transfer. CAT6 cables are designed for operating frequencies up to 250 MHz, compared to 100 Mhz for CAT5e. This means that a CAT6 cable can process more data at the same time. Think of it as the difference between a 2- and a 4-lane highway. On both, you can drive at the same speed, but a 4-lane highway can handle much more traffic at the same time.
redpill / bios_shims_collection . c:79 > mfgBIOS vtable [6] originally GetFanStatus [broadwellnk_synobios]
- Fruugo ID: 258392218-563234582
- EAN: 764486781913
-
Sold by: Fruugo