Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
In ISO 33002 the procedure, the roles of the assessment participants and the results of the assessment are specified in detail. This ensures that the assessment of projects from different suppliers and assessment teams can be compared. The lead assessor is responsible for carrying out the assessment. ASPICE ® V3.1 defines that the lead assessor must be certified as a “Competent Assessor” or higher with an identity card at intacs™ Certification as a “Provisional Assessor” is required for at least one further assessor. In Automotive SPICE ® V3.1, criteria for objective measurability, which are specified in ISO 33020, were implemented. The competence levels CL1 to CL5 are described in detail. The base practices and general practices reflect the requirements that processes must fulfill for certification of the respective competence level. Qualification of Assessors The SPICE standard began as a way to provide a framework for independent assessors to evaluate an organization’s capability for software development. Each of these points includes a corresponding testing phase, plus additional traceability and management processes. Suppliers can earn ASPICE certification according to these standardized achievement phases, and their assessment will result in specific ASPICE levels that clients take into account. The ASPICE standard is scored from 0-5, with definitions as follows:
Besides Automotive SPICE v3.1, all intacs™ ADD-ONs for Automotive SPICE are included in the current version: Agile SPICE™, Hardware Engineering SPICE and Mechanical Engineering SPICE. Organizations can only learn by attempting to improve their standards. Without a standard for achievement, it would be challenging to determine structured goals within the industry. ASPICE standards provide a benchmark for suppliers to ensure the stability of their processes and products, leading to an overall improvement in an industry where any mistake could cost you dearly. Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw. Evol. Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013) Teams achieving Level 1 either nearly or completely deliver standard ASPICE requirements, but likely have gaps in their processes.
Messnarz, R., et al.: Integrating functional safety, automotive SPICE and Six Sigma – the AQUA knowledge base and integration examples. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 285–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_26 ASPICE assessors use an NPLF scale to rate the degree to which the desired outcome was achieved. According to the scale, the results are either “not achieved,”“partially achieved,”“largely achieved” or “fully ISO - International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262 Road vehicles Functional Safety Part 1–10 (2011) Incorporate a testing phase at each step of production. This is the most important – and most challenging – phase of ASPICE compliance. Take the time to build a rigorous testing phase into each step of your new process. Seizing on the advanced capabilities of the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning, automotive engineering is changing the automotive industry in ways that were once unimaginable.
ASPICE (Automotive Software Process Improvement Capability dEtermination) is an industry-standard guideline for evaluating software development processes. Introduced in 2005, When a premium OEM compared suppliers that use ASPICE against those that did not, it discovered that the average ASPICE supplier found 90 percent of defects 11 months before the start of production, whereas the average non-ASPICE supplier found 90 percent Messnarz, R., Ekert, D.: Assessment‐based learning systems - learning from best projects. In: Wiley Inerscience, Software Process Improvement in Practice, Volume12, Issue6, Special Issue: Special Issue on Industrial Experiences in SPI, pp. 569–577 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.347,
If you plan to go through the ASPICE certification process, our experts can provide your team with ASPICE training for any role and at any level. We can also conduct an audit and a gap analysis to identify areas for improvement and help you implement the necessary changes.
In introducing and implementing Automotive SPICE ®, it is important to develop solutions in keeping with any specific circumstances that may affect a project or the situation faced by the company as a whole. This specialist manual equips you with an understanding of how to use the standard to solve a specific task. Used as an interpretation guide, it enables you to improve procedures effectively in keeping with Automotive SPICE ® standards. Templates to setup project areas which makes it easy and efficient teams to follow the processes and comply with requirements of various standards The 2nd edition was updated in line with Automotive SPICE ® v3.0. The picture is completed by looking at current topics such as practical assessments in keeping with intacs™ and VDA requirements, the challenges of process improvements, and AGILE DEVELOPMENT and FUNCTIONAL SAFETY ACCORDING TO ISO 26262. Messnarz, R., Ekert, D., Zehetner, T., Aschbacher, L.: Experiences with ASPICE 3.1 and the VDA automotive SPICE guidelines – using advanced assessment systems. In: Walker, A., O’Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1060. Springer, Cham (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_42 As you would imagine, the development of these automotive engineering advancements has precipitated the need for tougher industry standards. Standards that span process, safety, and emerging AI/Over-the-Air (OTA’s) updates. Adherence to standards such as Automotive SPICE (Automotive Software Performance Improvement and Capability dEtermination) – commonly known as ASPICE – is now not only advised, but has become a mandate. This presents a challenge to automotive engineers throughout the world. How do you comply with exponentially increasing sets of standards, created by numerous governing bodies, with requirements that could make your products prohibitively expensive?
Register Now
IBM Engineering embraces the ISO26262 standard across the engineering processes to help enable automotive safety in the development lifecycle. IBM ELM helps engineering teams to identify and assess safety risks, categorize these risks based on their criticality factor under the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) under ISO26262. These safety classifications help: Suppliers select members of their teams who have at least three years of relevant work experience to complete provisional ASPICE assessor training and certification through the International Accessors Certification Scheme (Intacs), ISO – International Organization for Standardization: ISO CD 26262–2018 2nd Edition Road vehicles Functional Safety (2018) But knowing that compliance is desired and actually achieving it are two different things. How can teams ensure compliance with the ASPICE standard?
Kreiner, C., et al.: Automotive knowledge alliance AQUA – integrating automotive SPICE, Six Sigma, and functional safety. In: McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2013. CCIS, vol. 364, pp. 333–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_30 With all these integrated systems, and their interconnectivity inside and outside the vehicle, more things can go wrong. And when a system malfunctions, it can do so with catastrophic results. Just read the headlines when new technology fails and you’ll see how devastating it can be. Failure is not only problematic for the driver and others on the roads, but also to automotive progress which is brought to a screeching halt when critical safety errors occur. When an entire industry can be impacted by a single, serious incident, compliance becomes imperative At Level 3, teams have established and set performance standards and are engaged in continuous improvement to constantly evaluate and learn. Module Design, or the creation of software requirements to match the system requirements and the development of service units. IBM provides a set of best practices to help organizations develop products that must comply with the ISO-26262 functional safety standard. The scope of these practices convers the areas that are described by ISO-26262, relating to management of functional safety, concept, system engineering, and software development. They have been developed to support the incremental adoption of process, practices and tools, thereby reducing the time to value for process improvement initiatives.Employees are often trained as Provisional Assessors. On the one hand, they can gain a deep insight as co-assessors. On the other hand, this knowledge is extremely valuable in the daily work of process definition and improvement, because the employee understands why individual practices are examined in Automotive SPICE ® and what potential value is derived from well defined processes, Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Software: Evolution Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013) The automobile of the 2020s hasn’t just transcended crank starters and wood paneling; today’s automobiles integrate multiple technologies developed by teams across industries all over the globe. The automobile market has evolved to include everything from self- or assisted-driving technology, automated safety features, and various green technologies, including electric and hybrid options.
Great Deal 
New Comment