Well-Behaved Women Seldom Make History (Vintage)

Product Information

Ulrich’s most famous book “ A Midwife’s Tale ” reports on information found through studying historical women. This includes information shared between midwives and doctors, pre-suffurage rape trials, common views on marriage, multiple accounts of what it was like deliviering babies as a pioneer woman, and the contribution of women to agriculture. Ulrich documented things that male historians didn’t see as important enough to pay attention to. There’s a lot that has been lost in history because of sexism within the academic field of history. We lost the recipe for concrete used in ancient Rome (which is much stronger than modern day concrete). There was additionally an extremely common spice used along with salt and pepper until the 19th century and we don’t know what it was. Section 5 details the fifty-three deliveries of babies Ballard performed in 1793. Ulrich emphasizes that an average of one baby a week seems easy, but Martha often sat for weeks doing nothing, and for others, facing multiple births in a short time during poor weather.

The forward of this book that relates how the well-known title has everybody and their brother projecting their own meaning on to it, was the most fascinating part for me. Even though I thought like ever so many others, that I knew what it meant, I found that so too did everybody with very different interpretations than my own. MyHome.ie (Opens in new window) • Top 1000 • The Gloss (Opens in new window) • Recruit Ireland (Opens in new window) • Irish Times Training (Opens in new window) Lavoie, Amy (September 20, 2007). "Ulrich explains that well-behaved women should make history". Harvard Gazette . Retrieved July 14, 2020. Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher (June 2002), "A Pail of Cream", The Journal of American History, 89 (1): 43–47, doi: 10.2307/2700782, JSTOR 2700782, archived from the original on October 15, 2012

Kahn-Leavitt, Laurie (1998). "The Making of 'A Midwife's Tale': Aaslh Awards Spotlight". History News. 53 (1): 18–22. JSTOR 42652424. Elizabeth puzzled over the power of her father’s books. When he wasn’t looking, she began to mark the offending statutes with pencil, plannin I had no idea how this would go when I started writing, but I feel like I was successfully able to explain a some feminist theory. It’s a very large and complicated subject. Do you agree with these perspectives and theories? Have you noticed any of these patterns before? Do you have any personal experiences with them? Never be afraid to comment below! Then there’s something that has popped up on random web forums throughout the years with little traction but very recently has showed up with a wider audience. The online ‘influencer’ Tanner Fox released a podcast in January where he asked “Do girls have hobbies?” He goes on to say “There’s a select few but it’s rare… Like us, you know, we go to the skate park, there are the skater girls, the girls-can-do-everythings-guys-can-do and so forth but they don’t choose the hobby.” The first chapter compares three feminists from three different generations: Catherine from the Middle Ages, Elizabeth Cady Stanton from the suffrage movement, and Virginia Wolfe just before World War I. Another chapter tells of three Harriets: Harriet Powell a runaway slave who strongly influenced Elizabeth Cady Stanton; Harriet Jacobs, a slave who hid in a cramped space above her grandmother’s shed for seven long years to avoid the sexual advances of her master; and Harriet Tubman of the Underground Railroad helping slaves escape. I did not really read the whole book, more skimming here and then and stopping to read more fully now and then.

All in all, I was happy to complete the book. Although I've read a fair amount on women's history, this did have some original contributions to my knowledge base. However, I'd recommend a more current history of women's rights that more parallels my own life history: Gail Collins' "When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present" (2010). Now there's a 5 star on women's history, very much more engaging. Even though it's probably a bit unfair to compare, as this is recent history, whereas Ulrich's book is much broader, with one woman author as long ago as the 15th century. As Rosalyn Baxandall and Linda Gordon observe, "Although the word 'feminist' has become a pejorative term for to some American women, most women (and most men as well) support a feminist program: equal education, equal pay, child care, freedom from harassment and violence," and so on.” My daughter bought me this book, which was an epic thing for her to do, because I was enthralled throughout the whole thing. The 1990 book “A Midwife’s Tale: The Life of Martha Ballard, Based on Her Diary, 1785-1812” by Ulrich reprinted and extensively commented on the diary entries of an ordinary midwife in Maine who also acted as a healer. The book illuminated the medical practices and sexual attitudes of the era and was awarded a Pulitzer-Prize and Bancroft Prize. Section 2 shows the separate economy among women in Hallowell. Ulrich describes this economy as facilitated by the 'social webs' of production and consumption.Roosevelt's My Day column ran six days a week from 1935 to mere weeks before her death in 1962. In that time, she only ever missed four days — when her husband collapsed and died, just months into his historic fourth term in office in April 1945. In her own right A Midwife's Tale was not only methodologically influential for scholars, but also theoretically important. By showing clearly the economic contributions that midwives made to their households and local communities, and demonstrating the organizational skill of multitasking as a source of female empowerment, the book revises the understanding of prescribed gender roles. While A Midwife's Tale is obviously limited in terms of time (1785–1812) and place (rural Maine), it has attracted sustained attention of historians—especially those interested in gender relations and wage-earning, the economic value of domestic labor, and women's work before industrialization. [20] Ulrich invokes these contributions to historical knowledge in a 2009 interview, stating, “I don’t think anonymous people need to be included in the historical record just because of fairness or justice. Studying them more carefully makes for more accurate history,” highlighting the potential for work like hers on historically non-dominant voices. [21] The book has also been taught as an exemplar of archival and historical work and explored in conjunction with Ulrich's own life as a historian, writer, and activist. [22] [23] [15] Summary [ edit ] Jason DeVillains: Yes, in recent times the quotation has also been attributed to Mae West. Here is a joke that West used in her stage act according to Ed Sullivan (from the days when impresario Sullivan wrote a gossip column).

Roosevelt served as first lady from 1933 to 1945, during her husband President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s four terms in office. She is widely credited with transforming the role of first lady from one in which the president’s spouse mainly acts as a “gracious hostess” to one in which she champions social causes more actively. Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History T-shirt, Feminist Tshirt, Women Empowerment Tshrt, Inspirational quote shirtGross, Terry (January 17, 2017). "How Mormon Polygamy In The 19th Century Fueled Women's Activism". www.NPR.org . Retrieved January 19, 2017.

What does 'good behavior' look like? How do the ways it's different for men and women affect things? How do individual women reject being well-behaved? What foundation are they working from? What is history? What does it mean to 'make' history? Shape it? Mold it? Achieve the honor of being mentioned three generations down the road? Affect world events? Is making history the job of the women of the past or the scholars who study them? Is 'making history' really the goal? If well-behaved women don't make history, is it fair to blame that on them? Or should we expand history to respect and allow their stories to matter? Can we ever find our voices now, without a concerted effort to end the silences of the past? Is big, radical, political, effective, intentional change the only history that matters? How do the myths and the incorrect assumptions and rumors tell interesting stories alongside the truth of the matters? If a woman is well-behaved but is rumored to be ill-behaved, what then? My first thought upon seeing this was “I’m begging men to start seeing women as human beings” and then I looked more into it and realized that that is in fact the problem. Misogyny revolves around seeing women as women before they’re seen as a person. Tanner Fox wasn’t talking about girls like they’re a group of people often interested in different things, he was talking about them like they’re a different species. Editor, Yards and Gates: Gender in Harvard and Radcliffe History. (2004). Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN 978-1-4039-6098-6 Lewis, Jan (March 2003). "The Age of Homespun: Objects and Stories in the Creation of an American Myth". The Journal of American History. 89 (4): 1495–1496. ProQuest 224893850. For example, let’s think about stereotypes with modern music. Justin Bieber is very disliked and his fanbase often gets eyerolls. I’m not a big fan of him myself. There’s a reason he’s hated, but I want you to ask yourself how you think people typically react to a teenage girl saying that their favorite song is “Baby” by Justin Bieber and then compare it to the reaction people would typically have to a teenage boy saying that his favorite song is “Run It!” by Chris Brown. People will probably form more of a bias against the girl saying she likes Bieber even though Chris Brown has a history of domestic violence, including that time he punched Rihanna in the face on camera.

Section 7 follows the death and autopsy of John Davis, the son of John Vassall Davis in Kennebec. Ulrich fleshes out the significance of Martha Ballard's presence at the autopsy. Ulrich discusses that in 1820, a Harvard Medical School professor published a treatise stating that women should no longer be midwives as they are not educated enough to practice medicine. The first entry in A Midwife's Tale puts midwifery in a broader medical context within the Kennebec region, beginning to put Ballard's diary in context of other primary sources at the time. This chapter establishes the relationship between doctors and midwives during this time period. Ulrich also introduces the concept of “social medicine” in this chapter, referring to the sharing of information among midwives and doctors. This is evident in midwife manuals that Ulrich cites. Laurel Thatcher Ulrich used the phrase, "Well-behaved women seldom make history" on a scholarly article she published in 1976. That phrase entered pop culture in 1995 when journalist Kay Mills used it in her book, From Pocahontas to Power Suits. Throughout history, “good” women’s lives were largely domestic, notes Ulrich. Little has been recorded about them because domesticity has not previously been considered a topic that merits inquiry. It is only through unconventional or outrageous behavior that women’s lives broke outside of this domestic sphere, and therefore were recorded and, thus, remembered by later generations. Ulrich points out that histories of “ordinary” women have not been widely known because historians have not looked carefully at their lives, adding that by exploring this facet of our past, we gain a richer understanding of history.