I place it on a tripod to avoid the effect of microphonics which is important on the micro, but it restores trs well my way! Both microphones are constructed of die-cast metal, although the PG58 comes in slightly heavier at 22.5 ounces compared to the estimated 10.5 ounces of the SM58. As dynamic mics, they don’t need the phantom power often required by a condenser microphone but still have a reasonable sensitivity and frequency response range.

Where this really comes into play, and you see what the difference between Shure SM58 and PG58 is with live performances, especially those not using a mic stand. Three, you may screw up on every time you engage phantom power to power your other static (unless you have a 48 volt power supply pad for each, but that's for high-end consoles). The Shure PG48 is the extreme budget vocal microphone for someone who apparently does not care about sound. There; you have heard all you need to know, but if you need more convincing, read ahead. It's virtually useless live if you want to connect it along with other condenser mics to the same mixer because of the unbalanced output transformer (unlike every single stage mic, Behringer included!).

Handheld Mic for Speech and Vocals

If you also use condenser mics and you turn the phantom power of the mixer on you'll break it, unless you have a high-end mixing desk with separate phantom power buttons on each channel). However, can the less expensive PG58 offer a similar experience? What Is The Difference Between Shure SM58 And PG58? Feature

Although they are durable and well-designed microphones, it is never recommended to connect a dynamic mic to an XLR input that has phantom power supplied.Live almost unusable on a console which is connected to mix multiple microphones, condenser microphones, which, as its output transformer type is asymmetric (unlike all the dynamic stage, even Behringer).