Without regard for distance, the lowest-flying balls include the Kirkland Performance+ V3, Inesis Tour 900 and Tour 900 Proto, the Snell MTB Prime and Volvik Tour VS4. Callaway Chrome Soft The “ball that changed the ball” was closely watched during this year’s test. Suffice it to say performance was significantly better this time around. We found no notable issues with the standard model which held up well alongside the other low-compression offerings. On another note, and I offer this simply as a suggestion, it strikes me that with regard iron performance, carry distance is a far more important metric than total distance…. It seems to me that carry should have more emphasis in your analytics than total distance…. just an opinion.

The point is that a golf ball can fly any number of ways that defy the limitations of simple descriptions like “low”, “mid” and “high” so, when looking for the right ball, it’s important to consider the full flight of the ball.For this year’s test, we switched from a 7-iron to an 8-iron and moved our wedge distance to 55 yards. Our hope was that with the higher-lofted clubs and shorter wedge shots, we’d see greater spin differentiation through the bag. Nearly two-thirds of the balls had some minor defect. In total, 25 percent of the sample was flagged as bad. True Price At 100 mph-equivalent iron speeds, the fastest balls are a mix of high- and low-compression models. I’m especially thankful for adding the mid-swing speeds. Very few players can consistently swing 115mph, not swing 85 mphs. So the old previous study required a lot of ‘blending’. Whether anyone finds it “hard to believe” isn’t particularly relevant; it’s simply what happened under the conditions tested.

Without regard for distance, the Seed SD-02, Bridgestone TOUR B RX and Callaway Supersoft flew the lowest. Great examination. There is no perfect test for all speeds and conditions. We all have to be aware that the desert makes everything longer and everyone needs to consider it. But that said this gives us an excellent look into the characteristics of these balls. The ONE thing that can’t be read into these results are dispersion in various wind conditions other than thinking that more spin can mean more dispersion but dimple patterns have a huge affect on this. This can also have a great affect distance. For most of the last two decades the Titleist ProVs were usually longer downwind than the others, but they had more side drift than others of similar spin from Bridgestone and TaylorMade, the ProVs were also shorter into notable winds..

What is Mizuno’s Breath Thermo technology?

Also interesting that some of the softer models were faster/longer than expected. Lots of good options, it’s just finding what works best for you.