ALTRA EGO™ dual-natured midsole compound with a responsive yet soft feel for increased energy return. Balanced cushioning places your heel and forefoot the same distance from the ground to encourage proper, low-impact form throughout your run.

As a midfoot striker, Kelly said she especially enjoyed the Lone Peak’s ride. “On smooth trails, I felt like I was gliding—almost floating—downhill. It was easy run fast without feeling like the shoes worked against me.” On our “light test”, Altra Lone Peak 5.0 performed “worst”, letting the least amount of light out: only 12.8LUX, while the average recorded result so far is 125.6LUX. We can thank the nylon upper for this. Great lacing system fixes the heel slip

Should You Buy the Altra Lone Peak 5?

There’s a bit of arch support in these which feels nice under foot, especially for a zero drop shoe that normally sees a flatter midsole profile.

The new upper has been made a little tougher than the previous models, with the addition of drainage holes in the overlays at the toes and outside of the midfoot. This is to prevent water from pooling in the shoes when crossing rivers or splashing through puddles. In this article we’ll describe in our opinion, the difference between the Lone Peak 6 and the Lone Peak 5. Just as it is important with running shorts and tops, the fit of a shoe is paramount to comfort. If you are a fan of spreading your toes with ample amounts of cushioning underfoot, we can't help but boast about the comfort and fit of this contender, and it scored above average in this metric. It offers a 0mm drop, meaning that there is no additional cushioning in the heel compared to the forefoot. This design is said to promote a more "balanced and healthier" landing for the body. That said, it does take practice, especially if you are a heel striker, to switch to striking the ground with your forefoot instead. This shoe is best for those that like a little cushion underfoot and are, or intend to become, a mid or forefoot striker. Note, they feel narrow based on my experience wearing other Altras, not in comparison to other running shoes in general.No doubt, that limited support can be a springboard for some hikers to develop their lower bodies and show off their ripped calves. But not me. That light-duty build took its toll on mt (flat) feet, (genetically) weak ankles, and skinny calves. On easier trails tha I normally hike, I had trouble with rolled ankles, cramping feet, shin splints, and calf strains. The Lone Peak 6 Wide, like the Lone Peak 5 Wide is actually no wider than the regular width, yet has more volume in the upper to fit a higher volume foot. Depending on the shape of your foot this would make the Lone Peak 6 Wide worth a try if you usually only fit in men’s 2E/4E or women’s D/2E running shoes. The cushioning was a little on the softer side, but it wasn’t a marshmallow. While I wouldn’t choose the Lone Peaks for speedwork or short, speedy racing, I could still get a good, responsive push-off from them,” said tester Kelly A., who has a neutral gait and a wider foot with an average arch height. I believe the Lone Peak 7 uses the same foam as its predecessor, so if you have the Lone Peak 6, you’ll know how the midsole holds up. And I’d predict that the midsole will not be the shoe’s limiting factor. It may feel slightly lifeless at 500 km, but it’ll keep going for longer. For those looking for a wide sizes, rejoice! The Lone Peak 5 comes in a wide version. And if you’re looking for water resistance and extra warmth, you might be interested in the waterproof version of the Lone Peak 5. Call for Comments