Investigator Eric Finch later learns more about Larkhill Resettlement Camp while reading Dr. Surridge’s diary, conspicuously left in her bedroom, on the night of her killing. Its contents, which Finch reveals in detail to Norsefire’s Leader, Adam Susan, tell a horrific history: Aided by Prothero, Lilliman, and others, Dr. Surridge conducted hormone testing on Larkhill’s prisoners, who she describes in her diary as being subhuman. Prisoners, also routinely tortured, developed grotesque appendages and atrophied genitalia before dying painful deaths. V, however, demonstrated no physical changes and instead experienced a psychotic break that led to increased intellectual powers. Those in charge, considering V harmless, allowed him to garden, and he increased the camp’s food production and grew Violet Carson roses. V’s work allowed him to gather ammonia-based fertilizer, which he later used to create an enormous toxic blast that killed many guards and allowed him to escape Larkhill. Rewatchability (2) – Synchronic had good characters and was set in the same universe as Spring, Resolution and The Endless .

The aliens are actually a network of a central Omega and fighter Alphas who each reset and adapt their war strategies to obliterate the humans.Heller, Bruno (12 October 2020). Pennyworth Season Two Cast & Producer Interview – EPIX . Po Rewatchability (2) – Haunter has a terrific concept and is tastefully executed. The reason for the loop was engaging. December 2008). V for Vendetta (Newed.). DC Vertigo. Archived from the original on 30 October 2018 . Retrieved 29 October 2018. Base Coherence (5) – Since the newer loops erase the previous ones, there is not much opportunity to mess things up. Most timeloop films end up with a full score in this section. Would we, I asked Moore somewhat nervously, be finding out who the perpetually-masked V actually was?

Coherence (5) – Given the Repercussion score is a 5, the Coherence score is the same as the Base Coherence score for this film. Rewatchability (2) – The film is a good one to watch perhaps once or twice, but the characters are not that consistent in terms of their development. Rewatchability (2)– It’s a lovely film which you will watch a couple of times to really understand it. But honestly, we already know that the more the sequels tried to show, the more they dug their timeline graves.

Coherence (1.8) – The final Coherence score stands corrected against the Repercussion score to 1.8 (3 x 3/5). Repercussion (1) – Time travel is to very distant points in the past, going from decades to centuries. I’m not sure if many viewers fancied the cast, but I liked the movie enough to watch it many times over the years. Base Coherence (3) – While the central part of the movie sports a single timeline with a ton of predestined events, we’re told about “editors” who alter the course of history. This causes a lot of inconsistencies in how the timelines are defined. Base Coherence (5) – Well, nothing being shown about the future automatically means that timelines established in the film are airtight, and there are no flaws.